Make the difference between can act and may act impossible to miss.
DGAF separates evidence, verification, authority, and permission so engineering capability cannot silently become authorization—or testing become proof.
Truth boundary
Substantial engineering and governance evidence exists. Epoch 002 dataset lock is established and bounded unblinding is authorized; neither establishes canonical DGAF efficacy, primary-analysis authorization, or downstream High-Assurance authority.
Four controls that never collapse into one another
Evidence
What was observed or produced, with exact scope and provenance.
Verification
What review predicate passed, and whether it was independent.
Authority
Which role or record can make a decision in the current state.
Permission
Whether the exact next action is actually allowed to occur.
Track A at a glance
Track A · Epoch 001
The blinded prospective collection and dataset lock completed, but the protected mapping is cryptographically unrecoverable, so the primary analysis is unanalyzable and was not run.
- 50 paired inferential seed units
- 2,250 blinded raw observations retained
- Dataset lock established
- Protected mapping cryptographically unrecoverable
- Primary analysis: UNANALYZABLE / NOT RUN
Track A · Epoch 002
The authorized blinded collection is complete, dataset lock is established, bounded unblinding is authorized, and materialization tooling is accepted; real materialization and primary analysis remain unestablished/unauthorized.
- Collection: COMPLETE · 50 paired seed units / 2,250 blinded observations
- Custody: SAME_SYSTEM_NONINDEPENDENT
- Dataset lock: ESTABLISHED
- Bounded unblinding: AUTHORIZED
- Materialization: NOT ESTABLISHED
- Primary analysis: NOT AUTHORIZED / NOT RUN